ipasis
Blog/Security Engineering

Enhancing Trust & Safety Architectures with Real-Time VPN Detection

December 30, 20254 min read

Trust & Safety (T&S) engineering is largely an arms race against obfuscation. For modern platforms, the primary vector for abuse—whether credential stuffing, credit card fraud, or ban evasion—is the masking of the request origin. Without visibility into the true nature of an IP address, standard rate limiting and geo-fencing are rendered ineffective.

This guide outlines the architectural necessity of VPN and proxy detection and demonstrates how to implement granular access control logic using IP intelligence.

The Anonymization Threat Vector

Sophisticated actors rarely attack directly. They utilize layered anonymization networks to bypass perimeter defenses.

  1. Datacenter Proxies: High volume, low cost. Used for brute-force attacks and scraping. Easily detected via ASN analysis.
  2. Residential Proxies: Rotated IPs from legitimate ISP ranges (often compromised IoT devices). These mimic legitimate user traffic and bypass simple ASN blocklists.
  3. Tor/Exit Nodes: Used for high-anonymity requirements, often correlating with malicious intent in e-commerce contexts.

If your application treats a request from a hosting provider (e.g., DigitalOcean) the same as a residential ISP (e.g., Comcast), you are exposing a significant attack surface.

Architecture: Synchronous vs. Asynchronous Detection

Integrating IP intelligence requires a decision on latency tolerance.

  • Synchronous (Blocking): The API is queried in the request middleware. Critical for login endpoints and payment gateways. Latency budget is typically <200ms.
  • Asynchronous (Flagging): The IP data is fetched via a job queue (e.g., Kafka, RabbitMQ) post-request. Useful for fraud scoring without impacting UX.

Implementation: Python Middleware Example

Below is a synchronous implementation pattern using Python. Note the fail-open logic; in high-availability T&S systems, it is often better to allow a potential bot than to block a legitimate user due to an API timeout.

import requests
from requests.exceptions import RequestException

def validate_request_origin(ip_address):
    # IPASIS API Endpoint
    endpoint = f"https://api.ipasis.com/v1/lookup?ip={ip_address}"
    headers = {"X-API-Key": "YOUR_IPASIS_KEY"}

    try:
        # Enforce strict timeout to preserve application latency
        response = requests.get(endpoint, headers=headers, timeout=0.3)
        data = response.json()

        security = data.get('security', {})

        # Critical Risk: Tor or Public Proxies
        if security.get('is_tor') or security.get('is_proxy'):
            return {"action": "BLOCK", "reason": "ANONYMIZER_DETECTED"}

        # Contextual Risk: Datacenter IP on a residential endpoint
        if security.get('is_datacenter'):
            return {"action": "2FA_CHALLENGE", "reason": "DATACENTER_IP"}

        return {"action": "ALLOW"}

    except RequestException:
        # Fail Open strategy
        return {"action": "ALLOW", "reason": "LOOKUP_TIMEOUT"}

Granular Policy Enforcement

Binary blocking (Block All VPNs) is rarely the correct strategy for modern applications. It results in high false positives, alienating privacy-conscious users or enterprise employees on corporate VPNs.

Instead, implement Risk-Based Authentication (RBA). Use the metadata provided by the IP intelligence provider to categorize the connection type.

Logic Flow (Node.js)

const determineAccessPolicy = (ipData) => {
  const { is_vpn, is_tor, connection_type } = ipData.security;
  
  // Scenario 1: High Confidence Threat
  if (is_tor) {
    return { allow: false, error: 'Anonymous networks not permitted.' };
  }

  // Scenario 2: VPN user, but likely legitimate (Residential VPN)
  // Many users utilize privacy VPNs. Do not auto-ban.
  if (is_vpn && connection_type === 'residential') {
    return { allow: true, risk_score: 20 }; // Log for monitoring
  }

  // Scenario 3: Datacenter IP attempting a purchase
  // High probability of fraud or bot.
  if (connection_type === 'datacenter') {
    return { allow: false, trigger_captcha: true };
  }

  return { allow: true, risk_score: 0 };
};

Data Enrichment for Fraud Models

Beyond immediate blocking, VPN detection data should feed into your Machine Learning fraud models. Features such as is_vpn, asn_org, and geo_mismatch (where IP location differs from billing address) are high-weight feature vectors in detecting Account Takeover (ATO).

FAQ

Q: Will detecting VPNs slow down my application? A: IPASIS is engineered for edge-side performance. With proper caching strategies (e.g., Redis) for repeat IPs, the latency impact is negligible.

Q: Should I block all datacenter IPs? A: For B2C applications, generally yes. Legitimate users rarely browse from AWS or Azure IPs. For B2B SaaS, allow-listing specific corporate ASNs is recommended.

Q: How do you handle residential proxies? A: Residential proxies are harder to detect than datacenter proxies. We utilize behavioral analysis combined with historical IP reputation data to flag IP pools known for abuse.

Secure Your Perimeter

Network layer obfuscation is the first signal of a sophisticated attack. Don't wait until the fraud chargeback hits your account.

Get your API Key from IPASIS today and start filtering malicious traffic at the edge.

Start detecting VPNs and Bots today.

Identify anonymized traffic instantly with IPASIS.

Get API Key